Friday 19 October 2012

Cradle of Filth: Daemonising the Female Body for 18 Sinful Years

It’s been a long and winding road for Cradle of Filth, from their ungodly inception in 1994 to their confirmation as one of the most revered (and, simultaneously, despised) extreme metal acts in Europe.  But, amid the ever-evolving tones of Filth’s post-black/dark/gothic/death mashup, some things have remained a constant.  It was no great surprise, therefore, when the first offering of their forthcoming album was released – which features the very worst of the band’s most recent nuances (rushed riffs, PVC-synths, and aimless melodies) – to hear the heartwarming groans of a woman in passion rushing obligingly to the aid of a song ailing amidst its own malodorous mediocrity.

After all, what better to sate the sinful than the authentic strains of a woman pretending to orgasm in a recording studio?  Cradle of Filth have form on this count, too, deploying the O-bomb as early as 1996 on their Dusk…and Her Embrace album.  The same taste for erotica has encouraged some of the band’s most vivid imagery, more often than not involving gratuitous descriptions of “cunts” (the word appears in all but three of their full-length albums and EPs since their 1994 The Principle of Evil Made Flesh).


Perhaps Filth’s finest hour – and certainly their most controversial – was heralded by their infamous “Jesus is a Cunt” t-shirt.  But, when it comes to music, their sexual bent serves more than just the shock factor.  The band’s lyrical and musical themes since 1994 form a pattern which feeds into a much broader discourse on sexuality and the female body.  Sex has been consistently summoned to invoke the spirit of sinful deviance, revelling in its glorification of explicit imagery which inverts the supposed “purity” of religious morality (who could forget the majestic wordplay of Cruelty Brought Thee Orchids, from the album Cruelty and the Beast: “Her cold cunt meat on holy bone”).

Dani Filth is certainly a talented lyricist, imaginatively weaving a number of themes through Cradle of Filth’s songs to produce some of the most sordid imagery around.  In playing off sex and religion, he’s chosen a very good target.  As a tendency which primarily seeks the moral self-discipline of the devoted, religion has always gotten the larger part of its authority from the ability to regulate its followers’ sexual activities.  And, by focusing on the feminine, Filth has taken particularly good aim.  A consistent focus for the self-appointed messengers of God, who have long used their religion to promote the ideal of the “pure” and “innocent”, women have inherited a pale and de-legitimised husk of sexuality from Christianity.

One of the most important elements underpinning the lyrical themes of Cradle of Filth, therefore, is the idea of a female sexual awakening.  This provides much of the substance for the band’s famous “cunts”, as in Red Roses for the Devil’s Whore (Dusk…and Her Embrace): “Dost thou not want to worship me/With crimson sacrifice/So my cunt may twitch against your kiss/And weep with new found life”.  Just so in For Your Vulgar Delectation: “Virgin cunts aquiver at this foreplay for the spiteful”.

Unleashed, the woman’s sexual passion is an irrepressible force which sweeps all before it.  This is an interpretation well portrayed in the song, Under Huntress Moon (from their 2006 album, Thornography), as the celestial beauty shines relentlessly upon helpless men.  Nonetheless, the same song reveals a dark, sinful core to female lust, which is inspired in “thighs/That Lucifer snuck inside”.  And the basis for this idea had been laid out in numerous Cradle of Filth songs well before Thornography’s release in 2006.  In Cruelty and the Beast, released a full decade previous, the sensual passion of the bloodthirsty Countess Bathory (“Elizabeth, paragon of vice”, as she is described) is invoked exclusively to emphasise her hedonistic evil.  Subsequent albums offer a somewhat different take on the matter: in 2004’s Nymphetamine, the band enlisted the sugar-sweet vocal chords of Liv Kristine to voice the part of a mistress whose passion ensnared her feverish and delirious lover.  Promising submission to his cravings (“I could always find the right slot for your sacred key”), Kristine’s lilting vocals nonetheless belie her own sensual gratification, as she teases her smitten victim, luring him with her soft tones like a siren (“Fold to my arms/Hold their mesmeric sway/And dance out to the moon/As we did in those golden days”).

What remains consistent throughout, however, is the sense of duality between femininity, on the one hand, and sexuality, on the other.  The woman is drawn by the impulses of the flesh, but, empowered by the depth of her passion, is then corrupted by its sinful influence, unleashing it for her own gratification to the detriment of others.  This thematic imagery has frequently found its way into the physical artwork of albums, which have portrayed both its cruel and frightening sides.  The covers of Nymphetamine and the earlier EP, Bitter Suites to Succubi, feature the fiery image of a demonic mistress, conjuring the prospect of cruel sexual domination (to avert any doubt, the succubus on the latter album cover was considerately dressed in leather for the occasion).



With greater deviousness, the fallen Eve on the back-cover of their 2004 album, Damnation and a Day is pictured sinking talon-like nails into the flesh of the Adam she embraces.



A strikingly different image is offered on the back-cover of Midian, upon which a shark bursts forth like a tongue from a mouth which gapes from a woman’s naked body.  Seemingly incapable of holding the beast within, the woman is rendered helpless and distraught by the power of her inner being.



All this gives a wicked and incisive edge to Cradle of Filth’s lyrics, which are often little short of brilliant in their glorification of darkness and sin.  There’s praise to be had, especially, for the poetic license of albums such as Damnation and a Day.  And yet, in seeking to embody spirit of sexual deviancy, the band have locked themselves into that very moral universe which they seek to degrade.  The notion of female sexuality as a force of evil feeds directly from the same moral authority which first established the woman as a “pure”, “innocent”, and, therefore, ideally asexual being.  Her transformation from this into a liberated and predatory sexual goddess, too, follows a pattern long established in the Christian canon, which contended that the sexually active woman sought to lead her men-folk astray by the temptation of the flesh.  The phallic symbolism of the snake which corrupted Eve, enlisting her sinful complicity by spurring her to tempt Adam, after all, shows how similar Filth’s and the bible’s interpretation of that story were.  The theme of temptation was, thereafter, much of the basis for medieval witch-hunts, and there’s more than just a hint of the same attitude in present-day arguments about women “inviting” men to rape them by wearing revealing clothing.

On the one hand, this calls into question the nature of the band’s self-appointed mission.  Cradle of Filth, since their first years of recorded existence, have been heretics, firstly of religion and morality, then of their own musical genre, as they deviated from black metal orthodoxy in search of graveyards new.  But, in tackling the issue of female sexuality, their decision to resurrect the oldest clichés going – the temptress, the whore, and the daemon – forces their themes into submissive observance of the most conservative of sexual values.

On the other hand, it’s worth asking what exactly Cradle of Filth have been saying all this time.  There’s very good reason to challenge the authority of religion over the human body and its expressions of pleasure.  As was once said, sex is, perhaps, the most democratic of all pleasure, being available to almost everyone who seeks it.  On the surface it might seem, then, that revelling in the “sin” of sexual temptation, flying, as it does, in the face of the Church and the God it created, it a worthy mission.  In this case, however, the end result – from the reproduction of the manipulative and callous temptress to the outright (and literal) demonisation of the female body – no more legitimises a woman’s right to sexual pleasure than do the most dogmatic and misogynistic of religious dogmas.

It’s not clear whether Filth and his colleagues are aware of this angle to their work: as artists, they have, in any case, both their own agenda and the exclusive right to set that agenda themselves.  In future, though, the band think about challenging the holy dictatorship of sex, they might want to give some deeper thought to what exactly they’re creating themselves.  They won’t, of course…

No comments:

Post a Comment